Wednesday, March 10, 2021

Studies in Daniel (Chapter 3, vv. 2-3)


The Great Assembly Summoned…


 

v. 2a: “Then Nebuchadnezzar the king sent word to assemble…”

o   A mighty assembly including of all the Empire’s civil and military dignitaries was summoned to attend the statue’s grand dedication.

 

v. 2b: “…the satraps, the prefects and the governors…”

o   The offices are listed, apparently, in rank order, representing all the provinces of Babylon’s multi-national, multi-ethnic empire (cf. v. 4).

 

o   Question: “WHERE was Daniel?”

Answer: Unknown! Silence regarding his whereabouts makes it almost certain that he was not present, sharing the fate of his friends.

 

But there must a reason why—as a key political figure—his absence was plausibly “excused” or permitted by the king. Various possibilities

 

>Was Daniel “on assignment” elsewhere?

>Did the King consciously “re-assign” Daniel, knowing the nature of Daniel’s faith?

>Was Daniel suffering from a providential illness at the time?

>Some implausibly suggest that Daniel was present & did not bow to image—but

as a favorite of the king, was not denounced by the Chaldeans like his brethren.

 

Several benefits arising from Daniel’s absence:

o   Daniel’s absence is another indication of the book’s authenticity; a later, spurious narrative would probably made Daniel the hero—not his friends!

 

o   Daniel’s absence provides an opportunity for his friends to shine brightly like the brightness of the expanse of heaven (Dan. 12:3)!

o   It is this incident that leads to their induction into the “Heroes of Faith Hall of Fame” as those who “quenched the power of fire” (Heb. 11:34).

 

o   A reminder that Daniel was not alone in his struggles; the Lord always has a righteous remnant—even in the worst of times (1 Kings 19:18; Rom. 11:2-5)!

 

v. 3: “…the satraps, the prefects and the governors…”

o   The grand list of courtly dignitaries is repeated, reflecting the element of stately pomp the proceedings were intended to convey by Nebuchadnezzar.

 

o   Yet, such stilted and “serious” language also seems to have a mocking tone, pointing to the vain & foolish pomposity of self-idolatrous human grandeur.

 

o   What can be more ridiculous than an enforced (and thus empty) worship rendered unto a gold-plated idol (i.e., something less-than-it-seems), that is designed to overthrow God and derail His Kingdom, while celebrating Human Sovereignty and the Eternal Kingdom of MAN?

 

o   The same stilted, mock seriousness is also found in vv. 5 & 7, listing (twice) the six instruments of the Royal Orchestra.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.