Sunday, December 29, 2024

MESSIAH: A Portrait Emerges

 

MESSIAH: A Portrait Emerges

(Pastor Terry L. Reese; Nov. 26, AD 2006; rev. 12/8/24)

 

TEXT: Luke 24:13-27. 

 

I. This week we begin our series of Christmas messages and ponder the real “Reason for the Season, considering the Divine Purpose behind the Incarnation—i.e., that God the Sonthe Eternal Sonthe Only Begottenthe Second Person of the Holy & Eternal Trinity… became our Immanuel (“God with us;” Isa. 7:14): God- come-in-the-flesh.

 

John 1:14: “And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us…”

 

Concerning the Incarnation, the Bible tells us this:

 

Gal. 4:4-5: But when the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the Law, so that He might redeem those who were under the Law, that we might receive the adoption as sons.

 

Our Text this morning—the encounter on the road to Emmaus—is oft thought of as an Easter Text; but Bethlehem can never be separated in our hearts and in our thoughts from Calvary. God the Father sent forth His Unique Son into to the world for a distinct purpose—a mission of Redemption which only He, the God-man, the uniquely Theanthropic Person, could accomplish:

 

John 3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

Luke 19:10 "For the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost."

John 17:4: “I glorified You on the earth, having accomplished the work which You have given Me to do.”

 

Nor can we separate His First Coming from His Second. Just as Bethlehem cannot be separated from Calvary, neither can it be separated from Armageddon and the New Jerusalem. God has an ultimate plan to redeem the entire Cosmos, which groans and suffers the pains of childbirth—a plan that will be brought unto consummation by the One who came in obscurity and Who, as a sign unto certain shepherds, was wrapped in swaddling clothes and laid in manger. He is the Christ of Easter & the Second Advent!

 

II. Now, it was in “the fullness of time” (Gal. 4:4)—2,000 years ago to us—that the Father did this thing, bringing forth His Only Begotten into the world for the sake of us poor sinners and our redemption.

 

This was accomplished by the Author & Master of Time, the Ancient of Days (Dan. 7:9), for whom a 1,000 years is but a moment (Ps. 90:4, 2 Pet 3:8), after many long centuries of preparation, whereby He created the necessary historical circumstances associated with our Lord’s First Advent in Bethlehem.

 

III. Divine Revelation has been a progressive thing… God gradually revealed more of Himself and of His Plan for the Ages throughout the parade of many centuries. Throughout the centuries, God spoke through His servants the prophets, progressively adding to His written revelation, and knowledge increased from dispensation to dispensation… Thus, more was known to Moses and his generation than was known to the Patriarchs (Ex 6:3)… Likewise, more was revealed through the later prophets than had been revealed through Moses… OT shadows, symbols, & types would be brought to clarity with the unfolding of the NT Dispensation…

 

Heb 1:1-2 God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world. 

 

IV. The prophecies of a coming Deliverer—the central narrative of Scripture—are of this nature. God spent many years working out His plan to bring the Savior into the world, and likewise, the prophecies of His coming, little-by-little, gradually and progressively unfolded over the ages.

 

Note what Jesus tells these two representative disciples (one named Cleopas); their bewilderment over the death of the Messiah was bewildering in-and-of itself (Luke 24:25-26); the Lord then explains the prophetic Scriptures to them (v. 27).

 

Luke 24:25-27: 25And He said to them, "O foolish men and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! 26Was it not necessary for the Christ to suffer these things and to enter into His glory?" 27Then beginning with Moses and with all the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures.

 

Please observe the illustration on the cover of your bulletin this morning. Think of each “dot” on the pictures as particles or pinpoints of information. Gradually, an image begins to take shape as the number of dots increase. The more bits of information, the greater the clarity of the illustration. The same is true with the OT prophecies and predictions concerning the coming Messiah. Each of the prophecies is like one of these dots, and the more bits of information, the clearer and more precise the portrait becomes.

 


V. The OT Messianic prophecies—predictions concerning the life, times, background, and works of a coming Messianic Redeemer—are the central storyline of the OT.

 

John 5:39: "You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; it is these that testify about Me…”

John 5:46: "For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote about Me.” 

 

There are literally hundreds of such prophesies! In fact, the legendary Hebrew-Christian scholar Alfred Edersheim, in his classic The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah (1883), documents no less than 456 such distinct prophesies:

 

Pentateuch-75; the Prophets-243; the Writings (Hagiographa)-138.

 


The sheer abundance of material that the Holy Spirit dedicated to the matter of Messiah’s correct identification is a certain indicator of the subject’s importance. Over the centuries there have been many Messianic claimants, and the whole world wants a Messiah—but only ONE is the genuine article who can save our souls and supernaturally recreate & reorder human society!

 

The nature of these prophecies:

o   They aren’t all found in one place; we’re to compare Scripture-with-Scripture & dig.

o   The collective witness isn’t presented in a form so obvious that men cannot hide from it if they so choose; but it is revealed with sufficient clarity that those who are familiar with it are without excuse.

o   Regarding the Faith & Apologetic Evidences: we are not required to unendingly pander to men’s stubborn obstinacy in the face of clear truth, but we are required to honor their honest doubts and questions (1 Pet 3:15: “…but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always {being} ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence…”)

 

VI. So why does God go out of his way to give us so much material, so many prophecies, concerning the life and times of the coming Messiah, and predicting the future acts and events associated with His life? Three reasons come to mind…

 

1.) A matter of identification. The more specific the information & numerous the clues, the more obvious genuine identification becomes; a matter of probability; the less room for coincidence. Through the OT witness, when the Christ made His appearance upon the world stage, the matter of His Identity should have been apparent and obvious.

 

Luke 24:25-27 And He said to them, "O foolish men and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! "Was it not necessary for the Christ to suffer these things and to enter into His glory?" Then beginning with Moses and with all the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures.

 

Luke 24:44-47 Now He said to them, "These are My words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things which are written about Me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled." Then He opened their minds to understand the Scriptures, and He said to them, "Thus it is written, that the Christ would suffer and rise again from the dead the third day, and that repentance for forgiveness of sins would be proclaimed in His name to all the nations, beginning from Jerusalem.

 

Likewise, His Apostles, at Solomon’s Portico and Thessalonica:

Acts 3:18 "But the things which God announced beforehand by the mouth of all the prophets, that His Christ would suffer, He has thus fulfilled.

 

Acts 17:2-3 And according to Paul's custom, he went to them, and for three Sabbaths reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and giving evidence that the Christ had to suffer and rise again from the dead, and saying, "This Jesus whom I am proclaiming to you is the Christ."

 

2.) The more qualifications that pile up for being the true Messiah, the harder it becomes for a prospective imposter to jump through all of the hoops and persuasively pose as the genuine article. Thus, a preponderance of evidence not only puts the finger upon the True, but also exposes the False. This is an important point, in light of our Lord’s warning of Matt. 24:24:

 

"For false Christs and false prophets will arise and will show great signs and wonders, so as to mislead, if possible, even the elect.”

 

History sadly confirms the accuracy of our Lord’s prediction, in a multitude of cases. The Jews having rejected Jesus, and have paid a heavy price in ensuring vulnerabity to False Messiahs (Bar Kochba, Moses of Crete, Abu Issa, David Reubeni, Shabbathai Zevi).

 

John 5:43 "I have come in My Father's name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, you will receive him.”

 

3.) In these predictions and in their accurate fulfillment in real history, we see important Theistic proofs. We see the Finger of God in these things, demonstrating both the existence, identity, and power of the true God, and the accuracy and infallibility of His Word… God Himself invites us make such an analysis, that He might demonstrate His verity. Unlike the Baalim, the true God knows the future:

 

Deut 18:21-22 "You may say in your heart, 'How will we know the word which the LORD has not spoken?' "When a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the thing does not come about or come true, that is the thing which the LORD has not spoken. The prophet has spoken it presumptuously; you shall not be afraid of him.

 

Is 44:7-8 'Who is like Me? Let him proclaim and declare it; Yes, let him recount it to Me in order, From the time that I established the ancient nation. And let them declare to them the things that are coming And the events that are going to take place. 'Do not tremble and do not be afraid; Have I not long since announced {it} to you and declared {it?} And you are My witnesses. Is there any God besides Me, Or is there any {other} Rock? I know of none.'"

 

V. What, then, is the nature of OT Messianic prophecy? Remember, last OT Book, Malachi, was written four centuries before Christ. A brief summary:

 

1) Initially, we learn that the Messiah will be a member of the human race, a male child, the Seed of the woman who will crush the head of Satan (Gen. 3:15; cf. Rom 16:20).

 

Then, we see a narrowing down of our possibilities with more information:

a Semite (Gen. 9:26); a son of Abraham (Gen. 12:2-3; cf. Matt 1:1 “The record of the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham…”); a son of Isaac (Gen. 26:4); of Jacob (Gen. 28:13-14; thus, a Jew); of Judah (Gen. 49:8-12); of Jesse (Isa. 11:1); of David (I Sam. 16:10-13, 2 Sam. 7); but not a blood descendent of Jehoiachin (Jer. 22:30; cf. Luke 3: Christ’s descent through Mary from an alternate line from David). >Who does that sound like?

 

2.) The nature of Messiah: both God and man. Cf. Ps. 110:1; Isaiah 7:14; 9:6-7; Micah 5:2; Zech. 12:10. >Who does that sound like?

 

3.) The nature of His ministry. A prophet like Moses (Dt. 18:15; a great intercessor, mediator of a New Covenant, prophet par excellent, etc.); one who will be uniquely both King and Priest (Ps. 110:1-4); one who is scourged (Isa. 53:5), pierced (Isa. 53:5; Zech. 12:10), cut off (Dan. 9:26), dies by crucifixion (Ps.22), and who suffers for the sins of the people, bearing their iniquities (Is. 53); and ultimately rises from the dead (Ps.16:10) to rule & reign (Ps.2:6; Isa.9:6-7). >Who does that sound like?

 

4.) Highly detailed incidents from the coming Messiah’s life. Stuff that cannot be “arranged,” and self-fulfilled?

 

A) The exact circumstances of his death (Ps. 22) related 1,000 years before, and hundreds of years before the Persians would invent crucifixion.

 

B) Other circumstances relating to His death: betrayed by a friend (Ps. 41:9), forsaken by His disciples (Zech. 13:7), rejected by His own people (Isa. 53:3, Ps. 118:22), sold for 30 pieces of silver (Zech. 11:12); the blood money would be thrown in the Temple, and would ultimately go to the potter (Zech. 11:13; cf. Matt. 27: 5,7); silent before His accusers (Isa. 53:7), crucified with thieves (Isa. 53:12), his garments divided up and lots cast for them (Ps. 22:18), He would suffer thirst and be given gall and vinegar (Ps. 69:21), He would issue a cry of forsakenness (Ps. 22:1), not a bone of Him would be broken (Ps. 34:20), but buried in a rich man’s tomb (Isa. 53:9).

 

C) Relating to His birth: born not only to a specific family, but at a specific place (Micah 5:2: "But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah…”), unto a Virgin (Isa. 7:14). Herod would kill the innocents (Jer. 31:15).

 

D.) Relating to circumstances surrounding His ministry: He would be preceded by a messenger (Isa. 40:3), receive a special anointing of the Holy Spirit (Isa. 11:2), His ministry would begin in Galilee (Isa. 9:1). This Minister of miracles (Isa. 35:5-6) and Teacher of Parables (Ps. 78:2) would appear at the Temple (Mal. 3:1) and enter Jerusalem on a donkey (Zech. 9:9). He would be a stumbling block to His own, the Jews (Ps. 118:2), but a Light unto the Gentiles (Isa. 60:3).

 

E) The 70 Weeks Prophecy (Dan. 9:24-27) tells us when all of this would happen.

Daniel 9: 24  Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. 25  Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. 26  And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. 27  And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

 

i. The 70 weeks are weeks (units of 7) of years. As with Rev., 360-day years employed.

 

ii. The Messiah shall come after 69 weeks, or 483 years, from the time of the decree (v. 25). The decree mentioned is that of Artaxerxes unto Nehemiah in 445 B.C. The Messiah was to come by the end of the 69th week—exactly the time of Jesus’ ministry (AD 33)—before the destruction of the Temple (AD 70). He will be killed (v. 26). The 70th Week awaits eschatological fulfillment.

 

iii. If Jesus is not the Messiah, then no Messiah is ever coming…

 

VI. We alluded earlier to the issue of probability. What are the odds of one man fulfilling, accidentally, these prophecies? A certain Professor Stoner of Westmont College did some studies along these lines, examining aspects related to various prophecies (relative potential for conspiratorial self-fulfillment, etc.).

 

Example of methodology: Micah 5:2. Took the estimated average populations of both the earth and Bethlehem since Micah’s time and estimated that a man’s chances of being born in Bethlehem were 1-in-300,000.

 

Using this sort of methodology, taking only 8 prophecies—not 456—Stoner estimated that the odds would be 1-in-10 to 17th power. Imagine covering the entire state of Texas 2 feet deep with silver dollars. Mark one of them, stir it around, and then have a blind man go anywhere he wants in the state and on the first attempt, pluck out the right coin.

Stoner also worked out the figures for 48 prophecies. The odds are now 1-in-10 to 157th power. Illustrate? Imagine a giant ball whose radius in any direction is 6 billion light years (1 l.y. = 6.4 trillion miles). Inside this ball are tiny electrons (if you counted 4 per second, it would take 19 million years just to count one inch worth). 2.5 x 10 to the 15th power = 1 inch. Mark one electron, fly a rocket ship into this vast ball, and pick out the correct one. That is the odds of 1-in-10 to 157th power. Statisticians tell us anything beyond 10 to 50th power is a de facto statistical zero; it just won’t happen!

 

In other words, this couldn’t be a matter of chance or coincidence. It means that we are looking at the Finger of God! It means, using every logical and reasonable method of scientific certainty that is known to man and which has been made available unto us, that Jesus the Messiah is Who He claims to be, and that there really is a God who is supernaturally directing the affairs of men.

 

In this age of philosophic existentialism and scientism in which we live, we often here the assertion that Faith is “believing in something that you know isn’t really true,” or Faith is designed as something that exists without regard to or in contrast with actual “fact.” But clearly, this is not the case.

 

God is real, His acts in history are real, and Faith and Fact are not in antithesis. In terms of Theistic Proofs, such as these, it is not as though we have to “prove” God’s existence, but we nonetheless would be remiss if we did not at least notice the fact that God has provided many convincing and infallible proofs for the mind of man to consider; and these things will one day indict man if he is not attentive to them.

 

There is more than enough for the hypothetical “honest inquirer” to feast upon, this Christmas Season—but how many “honest inquirers” are truly out there?

 

VII. He was foreknown of the prophets centuries before His birth…but do you know Him this morning? And if you do, have you grown too cool to be thrilled by Heavenly Things? These things should amaze us; cause us to tremble in godly fear! God is for real, and just as Jesus, the Messiah of God, truly came once, against all odds, He is really coming again! There are more prophecies about His Second Coming than His first. This is real! It’s going to happen! Do you live like you believe it? Or are you choked and paralyzed into inertia by the trivial cares and concerns of this passing age? This Christmas, let us pledge, as “wise men” to offer Jesus a gift:

 

Rom. 12:1-2: “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.

And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.”

Saturday, November 30, 2024

Some thoughts on the Social Gospel Movement

 

Some Thoughts on the

“SOCIAL GOSPEL” MOVEMENT

A Brief Survey, by Pastor Terry L. Reese; 11/30/24

 

 

A. Synopsis.

The basic and central idea behind the historic Social Gospel Movement and its modern progressive off-shoots: the Church should mainly focus upon doing good in the “real world” (i.e., the material realm of the “here-and-the-now”) through social & political activism—as opposed to spending its valuable energies and resources upon such idle and otherworldly-oriented activities as personal evangelism and Bible-based theological indoctrination.

 

The Social Gospel Movement is famous (or should we better say, infamous?) for advocating the perspective that human society is best served when the Church engages primarily in practical, meaningful, and materially-beneficial social activities, such as political & civic involvement, legislative campaigns, and societal-reform movements—all of which properly constitutes the Christian’s true calling and central emphasis (i.e., “Do politics, not evangelism!”)

 

B. Historical Background.

Historically, the original “Social Gospel” Movement was influenced by earlier “Christian Socialist” movements, arising and flourishing amidst elite Protestant circles during the late 19th & early 20th centuries. In many ways the Social Gospel Movement was a “Progressive Era” response and reaction to the societal problems associated with the excesses of the “Gilded Age” (c. 1870’s-1890’s) and its ruthless Social Darwinist philosophies (i.e., “Survival of the fittest... It is the “right” of the strong to dominate and exploit the weak!”). The Social Gospel Movement thus developed within the following historical context:

  

Ø  The rise of rapid industrialization;

 

Ø  The rise of urbanization and the corresponding decline of rural America, in which our cities became lodestones attracting cheap and readily exploitable labor (including young children);

 

Ø  The rise of urban rot and its accompanying social problems—including shocking levels of poverty, along with often nightmarish and wildly inhumane working conditions;

 

Ø  The rise of modernist philosophies and inevitably accompanying theological liberalism.

 

Ø  The rise of an optimistic view of human potential through accumulated wisdom and scientific progress.

 

Ø  A changed America: more industrial, more urban, more ethnically diverse, and less traditional

 

C. Some General Characteristics of the Social Gospel Movement.

 Various associated terminologies (“Social Christianity,” “social salvation,” and “social regeneration”) served to clarify the Movement’s aims, goals, and self-perception.

1. Theological Liberalism (i.e., Modernism), to varying degrees, captured the major mainline denominations and their seminaries in the Progressive Era (c. 1890’s-1920’s). The Social-Gospel Movement was often associated with such liberal modernists.

 

However, the influence and perimeters of the Social Gospel Movement was not exclusively limited to such Liberal/Modernist circles; some reform-minded evangelicals—influenced by the Arminian Second Great Awakening—also embraced the progressive social and humanitarian goals of the movement (e.g., three-time Democratic Party Presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan was associated with both the Social Gospel Movement and with Biblical Fundamentalism). Out of the Progressive/Social Gospel Era emerged various evangelical attempts at promoting social reform, employing such vehicles as the Salvation Army and the YMCA.

 

o   With regard to Liberal/Modernism, Scriptural authority was challenged by a destructive Higher Criticism that rejected Biblical inerrancy and traditional views of inspiration.

 

o   The Historic Faith of ancient Israel was seen by Liberals as the mere product of human historical development and evolutionary processes—as opposed to Divine revelation. Biblical-Era Judaism and later Christianity were fundamentally no different from any other religion, in terms of their human origins.

 

o   Liberals challenged—and generally rejected—the central doctrines of historic Christianity (e.g., the Trinity, the Deity of Christ, the Virgin Birth, direct and supernatural Creation, and doctrines relating to Man, Sin, and Salvation).

 

o   God was understood by classical Modernists to be wholly immanent, and thus fully identified with the world and its evolutionary processes—tending towards an impersonal pantheism (i.e., “God is everything & everything is God”). Miracles were thus rejected as something that originate from outside the natural order and stand in marked defiance to its “laws.” Thus, we see the celebrated watershed controversy arise in the early 20th century over the issue of the Virgin Birth.

 

o   Anthropology (i.e., the Doctrine of Man): Theologically Liberal Social Gospel advocates believed that Man is basically good, and that he is thus perfectible through natural means (e.g., education, good government, social reform, scientific discovery, etc.). Man’s problems arise from imperfect environments, lack of education, and unjust social structures.

o   Soteriology (i.e., salvation). Liberals did not believe that Man requires a spiritual or eschatological salvation either from personal sin, or from the wrath of some angered Personal Deity who required an appeasing act of propitiation (contra Rom. 3:25; Heb. 2:17; 1 John 2:2, 4:10). “Salvation,” rather, is equated with social and political reform, manifest in an earthly justice. The archaic and primitive concept of a literal “Hell” is not a reality to be either, feared or shunned.

 

2. Postmillennialism (i.e., the Churchnot Christ—creates a Millennial Golden Age).

 

o   According to firm social-gospel theorists (both liberal and evangelical), human effort would achieve the conditions of Matt. 6:10:

 

Matt. 6:10: “Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.”

 

o   Social Gospel advocates favored the idea that the guiding and reforming hand of an enlightened Church would bring about a new utopian age of social progress, via social & political activism.

 

o   The idea of a direct & catastrophic Divine intervention in the affairs of men (cf., Dan. 2:34-35, 44-45; 2 Pet. 3:4) as a necessary eschatological precursor to the millennial Kingdom Age was therefore rejected.

 

o   A point of contrast: Contemporary Fundamentalists of the Progressive Era, on the other hand, increasingly favored Premillennialism (i.e., the Biblical truth that Christ will return first, and then Personally establish the Kingdom).

 

3. An agenda largely focused upon practical politics, education & social reform.

 

o   Within Liberal Social Gospel circles, personal evangelism & Biblical indoctrination in the full counsel of Scripture (Matt. 28:19-20; Mark 16:15; John 20:15-17; Acts 20:17-27) was to be set aside in favor of applying basic Christian ethics unto various social problems.

 

o   The exclusive focus of ministry is thus to be engaged in social reform movements, battling such major societal ills as social injustice, racism, poverty, urban blight, bad health, poor nutrition, lack of education, alcoholism, crime, drug-abuse, marital discord, spousal abuse, and war.

 

C. The Progress & Influence of the Movement.

o   Prominent clergymen such as Washington Gladden & Walter Rauschenbusch helped to give shape to the Movement in late 19th & early 20th centuries.

 

o   The Social Gospel Movement functioned as the religious wing of the larger Progressive Movement.

 

o   The 20th century horrors of the World Wars and the Holocaust dampened the optimistic thrust of traditional Protestant Theological Liberalism, giving way to the more pessimistic theology of neo-orthodoxy (which had a greater degree of interest in the content of Scripture, but which was nonetheless built upon basic liberal foundations with regard to inspiration and inerrancy).

 

o   The less optimistic “Christian Realism” of Reinhold Niebuhr was an outgrowth of the Social Gospel Movement that tempered the idea of progress with an acknowledgement of the deep human capacity for evil (while nonetheless denying the Biblical concept of Original Sin). Niebuhr was a strong influence upon the thought of such diverse individuals as Martin Luther King, Jr. (who was NOT an orthodox, Bible-believing Christian) and President Jimmy Carter.

 

o   While the original “Movement” waned with the First World War, it left a lasting and indelible impact upon American political and social philosophy (e.g., the New Deal, the Great Society, modern Progressivism, etc.). In the realm of religion, both the modern church-affiliated Civil Rights Movement and radical Liberation Theology were heavily indebted to the older Social Gospel Movement.

 

o   Today’s fading neo-liberal mainline Protestant denominations of the National Council of Churches (NCC) and the World Council of Churches (WCC) persuasion continue to embrace a progressive social/political “gospel,” now extending its agenda and portfolio unto Climate Change and LGBTQ+ concerns.

 

o   A new generation of “woke,” Left-leaning progressive-evangelicals have picked up the torch of the old Social Gospel impulse, championing various progressive political concerns (e.g., climate change activism, liberal immigration policy, etc.), and lend support to the various branches of neo-Marxian Critical Theory. Once again, the Church is advised to focus heavily upon social and political activism—as opposed to SOUL WINNING and SPIRITUAL DISCIPLESHIP! So-called “Red Letter Christians” like Tony Campolo and Shane Claiborne fall into this general category of progressive-social justice oriented-evangelicalism. The increasingly irrelevant and unmoored CT (Christianity Today), once the flagship publication for the “New Evangelicalism,” is also rapidly descending further into this territory.

 

D. Some SERIOUS Biblical problems with this view…

Indeed, no Biblically-sound, orthodox, fundamental, conservative evangelical Christian in the world can formally endorse a viewpoint that says “Do politics, not evangelism!”

 

1.    A denial of the spiritual priorities of the Gospel.

a. The Social Gospel movement and its offshoots focus upon a secular social-salvation—as opposed to the personal, spiritual salvation of the individual.

 

But what does God HIMSELF say is to be first and primary, with regard to our message unto the world?

 

1 Cor. 15:3-4: “For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that He was buried, that He was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures…”

 

b. Our root problem is SIN—not imperfect social environments and institutions, or unjust political and economic systems.

 

Our principle and foundational message unto a lost world full of sin remains

 

Rom. 6:23: “For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.”

John 3:16: “For God so loved the world, that he gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish, but have eternal life.”

 

c. Men need personal salvation from the terrifying wrath that is to come—which emanates from the holiness of God!!!

 

Matt. 3:7b: “O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?”

Rom. 5:9: “Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from the wrath of God through Him.”

1 Thess. 1:10b: “…Jesus, who rescues us from the wrath to come.”

Rev. 6:16-17: “…and they said to the mountains and to the rocks, "Fall on us and hide us from the presence of Him who sits on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb; for the great day of their wrath has come, and who is able to stand?" 

 

d. The primary responsibility of a missionary: PREACHING THE SALVATION OF GOD AS REVEALED IN THE WORD! Preaching Christ crucified—Good News, and a summons to repentance!

 

Rom. 10:13-14: “…for "Whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved." How then will they call on Him in whom they have not believed? How will they believe in Him whom they have not heard? And how will they hear without a preacher?”

Acts 20:21: “…testifying both to Jews and to Greeks of repentance toward God and of faith in our Lord Jesus Christ.”

Matt. 3:2: “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”

Mark 16:15: “Go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation.”

Acts 17:2-3: And Paul went in, as was his custom, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and proving that it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead, and saying, “This Jesus, whom I proclaim to you, is the Christ.”

1Cor. 1:22-23: “For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles…”

1Cor. 2:1-2: “And I, when I came to you, brothers, did not come proclaiming to you the testimony of God with lofty speech or wisdom. For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified.” 

 

e. The primary responsibility of a Pastor: FEEDING AND DISCIPLING THE SHEEP! Teaching the WHOLE COUNSEL of the Word of God!

 

John 21:17: “Simon, son of John, do you love me?… Feed my sheep.”

Matt. 28:19-20: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations… teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.”

Acts 20:27: “…for I did not shrink from declaring to you the whole counsel of God.”

 

The “whole counsel” even involves persistently teaching upon such things as the coming millennial Kingdom of God and the finer details of eschatology—something that is generally despised and derided by Social Gospel-type theorists, who disdainfully boast that they “can do nothing with the Fundamentalists and their absurd prophecy charts!”

 

Acts 19:8: And he entered the synagogue and for three months spoke boldly, reasoning and persuading them about the kingdom of God.

Acts 28:23: When they had appointed a day for him, they came to him at his lodging in greater numbers. From morning till evening he expounded to them, testifying to the kingdom of God and trying to convince them about Jesus both from the Law of Moses and from the Prophets.

Acts 28:30-31: He lived there two whole years at his own expense, and welcomed all who came to him, proclaiming the kingdom of God and teaching about the Lord Jesus Christ with all boldness and without hindrance.

 

2.    The progressive Social Gospel viewpoint is rooted in progressive, unbiblical worldview-assumptions.

 

a. A denial of the cosmic radical effects of the Fall…

Only the power of Christ can bring a New Earth, uncontaminated by the effects of Adam’s sin and the Curse (Rom. 8:19-21; Rev. 21:1-5).

 

b. A humanistic and absurdly optimistic view of human potential…

John 15:4-5: "Abide in Me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself unless it abides in the vine, so neither can you unless you abide in Me. I am the vine, you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, he bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing.

 

i. An unrealistic concept of human & societal perfectibility

 

i.a. Society-in-general—largely unregenerate—hopelessly misses the mark of Divine standards…

Rom. 3:23: “…for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”

 

…And thus can only achieve very narrow & limited results

Matt. 7:17: "So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit.”

 

i.b.And even if everyone was a Christian, the world would still not be converted into the postmillennialist’s Utopian Paradise, due to the continued presence of sin within the believer that wars both against the Holy Spirit (Gal. 5:17) and against the believer’s own new Regenerate Nature (Rom. 7:14-25).

 

Gal 5:17: For the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit, and the desires of the Spirit are against the flesh, for these are opposed to each other, to keep you from doing the things you want to do.

Rom 7:19: For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing.

 

i.c. Jesus did not see humanity as being objectively “good,” when discussing the benevolence of God.

 

Matt. 7:11: "If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give what is good to those who ask Him!”

 

ii. Social Gospel thinking has an unbiblically high degree of confidence in man’s “reason” and in the human sciences. This view ignores the noetic effects of sin (i.e., the effects of sin upon the mind).

 

I Cor. 2:14: But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised.

Isa 55:8: For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the LORD.

 

iii. This view ignores the Biblical data concerning Total Depravity.

 

a. Aspects of Total Depravity.

 

1. There is nothing that Man can do to merit saving-favor with God.

John 6:28-29: Then they said to him, “What must we do, to be doing the works of God?” Jesus answered them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent.”

 

2. Depravity extends to every aspect of Man’s being, nature, and faculties—spiritual, physical, mental, emotional.

 

3. This depravity is universal; none—save for Christ—are exempt.

 

4. Natural Man’s inclination is towards sin and is antagonistic towards God.

 

Ps. 51:5: Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin my mother conceived me.

Eph. 2:1: “And you were dead in your trespasses and sins…”

Eph. 2:3b: “…and were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest.”

 

b. John Calvin’s definition of Natural Man’s depraved state:

“All men are conceived in sin, and born the children of wrath, indisposed to all saving good, propense to evil, dead in sin, and the slaves of sin; and without the regenerating grace of the Holy Spirit, they neither are willing nor able to return to God, to correct their depraved nature, or to dispose themselves to the correction of it.”

 

c. The Scriptures loudly affirm the doctrine of Total Depravity.

Gen. 6:5: Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

Jer. 17:9: The heart is more deceitful than all else and is desperately sick; who can understand it?

Rom. 3:10-11: “…as it is written, ‘There is none righteous, not even one;

there is none who understands, there is none who seeks for God…”

Rom. 3:23 “…for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”

Isa. 64:6:  For all of us have become like one who is unclean, and all our righteous deeds are like a filthy garment; and all of us wither like a leaf, and our iniquities, like the wind, take us away.

 

iv. The Social Gospel view thus fails to recognize that man’s heart—not his environment—is the real & ultimate culprit, with reference to society’s ills!

 

o   Ultimately, this will be once-and-for-all proven when countless unregenerates born during the Kingdom Age—a perfect environment—will rise in rebellion against the Lord Jesus Christ!

 

Rev. 20:8b: “…the number of them is like the sand of the seashore.”

 

3.    Worldly humanism vs. Biblical charity.

Ps. 82:3-4: Give justice to the weak and the fatherless; maintain the right of the afflicted and the destitute. Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked.”

 

o   There are many Biblical passages calling for equal justice, as well as for mercy & concern, for the poor and the weak…

 

o   These, however, are often distorted and removed from their original context in order to support modern utopian & progressive political/economic/social agendas that set aside other aspects of Biblical revelation.

o   For example, a Scripture like Ex. 23:9 cannot be justly employed to support the wholesale eradication of national borders and to promote an unlimited immigration policy!

 

o   There is a distinction between a socialistic egalitarianism (i.e., where an equality of economic outcomes is enforced by the state) vs. American constitutional equality (i.e., the state treats everyone equally, in that everyone plays by the same rules—thus guaranteeing unequal outcomes).

 

o   The Biblical ethic demands that justice before the Law be blind (Deut. 1:16-17)—but there is no Biblical call for partiality towards the lowly or the sort of economic leveling associated with the modern “Social Justice” movement.

 

o   Early Christians sometimes voluntarily shared their wealth (Acts 2:44, 4:32-37)—but this benevolence was never compulsory in nature (Acts 5:4)!

 

4.    The miserable, rotten fruit of the liberal NCC (National Council of Churches) and the WCC (World Council of Churches)

 

a. The farce of the modern liberal mainline Protestant church…

 

Ø  False churches without the Gospel, hypocritically bearing historic denominational titles while opening denying the historic creeds of their own diverse faith-traditions!

 

Ø  Unsaved workers of iniquity bearing Divinely-ordained offices—in defiance of the prescribed Biblical qualifications (1Tim. 3:1-13)!

 

Ø  NO Biblically prescribed ecclesiastical discipline (Matt. 18:15-20, I Cor. 5:1-13)! I Cor. 5:13b: “Purge the evil person from among you.”

 

Ø  Open support for gross immorality (e.g., abortion & LGBT lifestyles)!

 

b. Uncritical support for leftist extremism & terrorism.

In the past, WCC financial support—garnered from local church offerings—has ended up in the hands of Marxist Third World extremist guerilla movements!

 

c. Consistent, systematic hostility towards the modern state of Israel.

Foreshadowing today’s antisemitic pro-Hamas activism, the WCC has long been unwavering in its support for Israel’s radical and murderous enemies, and has also repeatedly condemned so-called “Christian Zionism”—even branding Christian support for Israel’s right to the Land as “heresy!”

 

Gen. 12:3: “And I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse.”

Gen. 15:18: “On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, "To your descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates…”

 

5.    Activism without the Gospel: nothing but a “BAND-AID” solution!

Political/civic/social involvement without the heart-regenerating, saving-power of Gospel leads to short-term, hollow victories, at best.

 

i. It is TRUE that human civil Government plays an important, Divinely-ordained role in restraining evil (cf., p. 26; Rom. 13:1-4).

 

a. Employing the fear of punishment, Civil Law acts as a curb or restraint upon the open and tangible outbreak of evil and lawlessness that lies dormant within men’s hearts

 

b. Civil government also functions as an instructor of ethics: good laws unavoidably have an influence in informing the citizenry as to what constitutes good and evil…

 

o   Consider the responsive mindset of the people to civic legislation: if the civil magistrate either permits or bans a given activity, it has influential weight with the public:

  

Ø  “Hey, if even the government says it’s OK, then it MUST be OK!”

Ø  “That’s not good… They have LAWS against that sort of stuff!”

 

o   Consider how legislative approval of abortion, same-sex marriage, and marijuana usage has unwoven the moral fabric of our nation!

 

ii. BUT… good laws and good government cannot change the heart!

 

o   If the HEART and INNER MAN is not changed, real lasting societal change is not possible.

 

o   If the HEART is not changed, only an outward, begrudging, minimal, and temporary conformity to good legislation is achieved.

 

o   Only GOD, through the agency of the Word (1 Pet. 1:23) by the Sovereign power of the Spirit (John 3:3-8) can change and regenerate the heart.

 

2 Cor. 5:17: Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come.

Ezek. 11:19-20: "And I will give them one heart, and put a new spirit within them. And I will take the heart of stone out of their flesh and give them a heart of flesh, that they may walk in My statutes and keep My ordinances and do them. Then they will be My people, and I shall be their God.”

Ezek. 36:26: "Moreover, I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; and I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh.”

Jer. 31:33: "But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days," declares the LORD, "I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.”

Jer. 32:40: "I will make an everlasting covenant with them that I will not turn away from them, to do them good; and I will put the fear of Me in their hearts so that they will not turn away from Me.”

 

E. FINALLY: A word to our fellow conservative Evangelicals: The failure of politically-active theological Liberals should serve as a caveat to US!

 

o   Some advocates of extreme pietism (the diametrical opposite of the Social Gospel viewpoint, who argue against any form of Christian civic/political involvement) have accused some politically-active and socially-concerned conservative Evangelicals and Fundamentalists of lapsing into a sort of right-wing “Social Gospel.”

 

o   This is, however, largely a hypothetical straw-man and exercise exaggerated rhetorical polemic: absolutely NO legitimate and representative Biblically-conservative Evangelical advocacy-group advises believers to “Do Politics, not Evangelism!

 

o   Consider the historic track-record of such theologically conservative groups as The Moral Majority, Focus on the Family, The American Center for Law and Justice, and The Christian Coalition

 

o   None have advocated setting aside the primacy of the Gospel!

o   None have claimed that a certain politician’s success will set aside our need for God and His Word!

o   None have claimed that a particular legislative campaign will bring us ultimate Redemption or a consummate state of societal perfection!

o   None have suggested that various political exertions (electioneering, petitions, lobbying, etc.) should ever replace prayer, Bible Study, and personal evangelism!

 

o   Nonetheless, politically-active conservative Evangelicals would be well-advised to…

…carefully consider their ways,

…be ever mindful of what is primary,

…be neither overly naïve nor optimistic when it comes to the political process,

…be shrewd in placing our confidence in the real motives of politicians,

…be mindful of personal testimony,

…speak the truth in love (Eph. 4:15),

…carefully choose their battles,

…and thus proceed in their involvement with a degree of caution.

 

Hopefully, our political ideology is consistent with our profession of Faith, representing an out-flow of its basic foundational premises, presuppositions, and ethical precepts.

 

And yet, we should also recognize that a general political category is not synonymous, in the absolute sense, with the totality of our Faith—particularly regarding its redemptive aspects. While I agree that political conservatism is more consistent with the Judeo-Christian Worldview than various other current political perspectives, there nonetheless remains a meaningful distinction between a political liberal and a theological liberal. Being a conservative Republican, in-and-of-itself, won’t get you into Heaven—and being a moderately-liberal Democrat won’t automatically bar you from the same!

 

By all means, let us engage in the cultural mandate and reasonably participate in the ongoing political process and debate… but let us also be mindful of our testimony, and endeavor to be both gracious and sensitive unto others when involved in the discussion! Remember that not all of our legitimate brothers and sisters in Christ have successfully “connected-the-dots” in terms of relating the presuppositions of the Christian world-and-life-view to political philosophy—and should therefore be aided and instructed with care and compassion.