Wednesday, December 8, 2021

Studies in Daniel: Introduction to the Dream of the Great Tree (Dan. 4:1-3)

 

II. God’s Sovereignty seen in His Control over World Empires (chs. 2-7).

 C. The Dream of the Great Tree and the humbling of Nebuchadnezzar (4:1-37).

great tree
 

1. Various themes & emphases of the narrative.

 

a. The culmination of the unfolding story of God’s personal spiritual dealings with King Nebuchadnezzar.

 

b. A lesson in the folly of pride, the mother of sins.


c. A study in God’s gracious, redemptive correction—as opposed to chapter 5, where

Divine punishment is purely punitive.

 

d. As the representative Gentile world power, symbolizing the Kingdom of Man in all of its sinful manifestations, judgment upon Babylon’s ruler (and upon the Neo-Babylonian Empire itself in ch. 5) foreshadows, in the typical-sense, the termination of the Times of the Gentiles with final downfall of the End-Time Antichrist.

 

e. Chapters 4 & 5 together—through the experiences of the first (Nebuchadnezzar) and last (Belshazzar) kings of the first world-empire associated with the Times of the Gentiles—serve as a reminder that ultimately one day Gentile rulers will acknowledge that ultimate sovereignty belongs to the Most High (Phil. 2:10-11)!

 

2. Various literary characteristics & distinctives of the narrative.

 

a. One of the lengthiest chapters in the Book of Daniel.

 

b. Unusual authorship: for the most part, essentially an extended first-person autobiographical narrative & edict coming from the mouth of King Nebuchadnezzar himself (!)—with perhaps some degree of editing by Daniel in passages where the King is referred to in the third-person (vv. 28-33).

 

o   It is possible that the King employed the aid of Daniel and/or others in its composition; note, for example, similarities to Ps. 145:13.

 

o   In antiquity, royal officials were sometimes authorized to write official decrees in the ruler’s name (e.g., Esther 3:12, 8:8-10).

 

o   Inspiration demands that this official and universally broadcast edict from Babylon’s King has been faithfully & accurately recorded by Daniel (cf., Ezra 1:2-4, Acts 23:26-30). Its inclusion here is God’s will!

 

o   It must be remembered that God can speak through whatever vessel He sovereignly appoints! (Num. 22:28, 30; John 11:49-52).


c. Chapter 4’s relationship to Daniel’s literary pattern of employing chiasm.


i. A Chiastic structure, or pattern, is a literary device employing symmetrically

arranged, corresponding narrative patterns (i.e., a mirror image). For example:

 

A: Idea “A”

   B: Idea “B”

      C: Idea “C”

      C: Idea “C”

   B: Idea “B”

A: Idea “A”

 

Gen. 9:6a is an example of a chiasm found within a single verse:

“Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed…”

 

A:   Whoever sheds

B:   the blood

C:   of man

C:   by man shall

B:   his blood

A:   be shed

 

The chiastic structure underscores the central point: i.e., the law of retributive justice is to be upheld (“blood”-“blood”), in that the Divinely-prescribed corrective for the chaos of human violence is the orderly administration of justice—which is to be administered by human government (“man”-“man”), in harmony with Rom. 13.

 

ii. Chiasm is involved in Daniel’s overall literary construction: chs. 1-7 & 8-12.

 

o   There are varying approaches to organizing the outline of Daniel, including:

1)    Literary Content/Genre: the Historical Narrative sections (chs. 1-6) vs. the Prophetic/Visionary portions (chs. 7-12);

 

2)    Linguistic: the Aramaic sections (chs. 2-7) vs. the Hebrew (chs. 1, 8-12).

 

o   Many, focusing upon the Linguistic approach, have detected a chiasm in Daniel’s overall structure.

 

o   The thematic chiasm of the Aramaic portions (chs. 2-7) is quite self-evident.

 

o   Some would suggest that Daniel’s entire structure is based upon a sort of double-chiasm.

 

o   In this organizational pattern the Aramaic portions (chs. 2-7) would form a chiasm, and Hebrew sections (chs. 8-11) would also form a second chiasm. Both sections are generally viewed as being connected and bracketed by a Hebrew Prologue & Epilogue (chs. 1 & 12).

 

o   The Hebrew portions (chs. 8-12) might be outlined with different variations and with more-or-less detail, depending upon the student, but the chart below provides the reader with the basic and general idea:

Book of Daniel Chiasm


 

iii.  Within the context of the Aramaic-chiasm (chs. 2-7), Dan. 4 parallels Dan. 5.

Dr. John Walvoord, Daniel:

Structurally, chapter 4 is parallel to chapter 5 and sits at the center of the chiasm formed in the Aramaic section of the book. Chapters 2 and 7 highlight the certain coming of God’s kingdom following the rise of four successive Gentile powers. Chapters 3 and 6 focus on the need for God’s people to remain faithful despite opposition and persecution as they await His kingdom.

 

Thus, God’s humbling of proud Nebuchadnezzar stands as a parallel to the humbling of his grandson, the proud Belshazzar—though with greatly differing personal outcomes!

 

iv. Literary analysis has also detected various other chiasms within Daniel

(e.g., The Seventy Weeks Prophecy of Dan. 9:25-27, Dan. 6).

 

v. Daniel 4 is, in-and-of-itself a chiasm.

Dr. John Constable, Expository Notes on Daniel:

The structure of the chapter is essentially ABBA, chiastic. It begins and ends with praise of God (Dan. 4:1-3; Dan. 4:34-37), and in the middle there is the narration of Nebuchadnezzar's dream (Dan. 4:4-18), and its interpretation and fulfillment (Dan. 4:19-33).

 

Thus, in accordance with the above:

 

A: King Nebuchadnezzar praises God (4:1-3)

B: Nebuchadnezzar’s dream: its substance (4:4-18)

B: Nebuchadnezzar’s dream: its interpretation and fulfillment (4:19-33)

A: King Nebuchadnezzar praises God (4:34-37)

 

Some would offer a more detailed chiasm:

 

A: Prologue: The King praises God (4:1-3)

B: The RECEPTION of the Dream (4:4-7)

C: DIALOGUE with Daniel (4:8-9)

D: The Dream RELATED (4:10-17)

E: DIALOGUE: The King to Daniel (4:18-19a)

E: DIALOGUE: Daniel to the King (4:19b)

D: The Dream INTERPRETED (4:20-26)

C: DIALOGUE with the King (4:27)

B: The FULFILLMENT of the Dream (4:28-33)

A: Epilogue: The King Praises God (4:34-37)


 

3. The Prologue: the King Praises God (v. 1-3).

v.1a: “Nebuchadnezzar the king…”

o   The King’s testimony is probably to be dated circa 562 BC. This proclamation represents our final word from what may have been the greatest Gentile sovereign of antiquity—possibly delivered shortly before the end of his long reign of 43 years (605-562 BC) at the age of 80.

 

o   Accordingly, the dream itself probably occurred a decade or less before the King’s death (c. 572 BC), allowing for the year graciously allotted to him to heed Daniel’s call for repentance (4:26, 29), and for the seven years of madness (4:16, 25, 32).

 

v. 1b: “to all the peoples, nations, and men…”

o   Written in the style and form of an official public document—a royal proclamation.

 

o   The previously vainglorious monarch places the story of his disgrace and humiliation into the open public record—speaking with the sense of urgency and missionary zeal that characterizes a new convert!

 

o   An analogy: imagine a powerful Head of State of our own day repenting of his sins and then calling an internationally televised press conference to testify as to his own native foolishness and to the saving-power of Jesus Christ!

 

o   David Jeremiah, in his commentary The Handwriting on the Wall, labels this chapter “The Gospel according to Nebuchadnezzar.”

 

o   “to all the peoples…” Customarily, hyperbolic universal language was commonly used by rulers of great empires—even though they did not literally enjoy universal dominion (Dan. 3:29, Luke 2:1).

 

o   Ancient Mesopotamian tradition—extending back to Sumerian times & pre-dating Nebuchadnezzar by many centuries—commonly defined the perimeters of meaningful civilization to the general proximities of the ancient near east.

 

o   However, the Neo-Babylonian empire was in fact ethnically diverse, representing many different races, tribes, kindreds, and tongues.

 

o   Furthermore, King Nebuchadnezzar was in fact granted a hypothetical & potential universal sovereignty at the Hands of God! His sovereignty is spoken of in Jer. 27:5-8 & 11 in terms that recall the dominion of Adam exercised in the early Earth. Apparently, it was only his own pride that limited him and kept him from achieving & realizing worldwide dominion.

 

Jer. 27:5-8: "I have made the earth, the men and the beasts which are on the face of the earth by My great power and by My outstretched arm, and I will give it to the one who is pleasing in My sight. Now I have given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, My servant, and I have given him also the wild animals of the field to serve him. All the nations shall serve him and his son and his grandson until the time of his own land comes; then many nations and great kings will make him their servant. It will be, that the nation or the kingdom which will not serve him, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, and which will not put its neck under the yoke of the king of Babylon, I will punish that nation with the sword, with famine and with pestilence," declares the LORD, "until I have destroyed it by his hand.”

 

Jer. 27:11: "But the nation which will bring its neck under the yoke of the king of Babylon and serve him, I will let remain on its land," declares the LORD, "and they will till it and dwell in it."

 

o   The address to a universal audience, however, may represent something more than a hyperbolic expression. The King may be proclaiming the Good News of his redemption even unto those members of the human race who were not directly under the immediate auspices of his scepter (cf., Matt. 28:19).

 

v. 1c: "May your peace abound!”

o   A common oriental salutation (cf., Ezra 4:17), corresponding to the Hebrew “Shalom!” The idea is expressed that the person addressed might be preserved from all that may potentially disturb him and experience well-being.

 

o   However, coming from the mouth of the Elect, it suggests a more meaningful usage, as when it was adopted by the early Christian community (Titus 1:4, 1 Pet. 1:2, 2 Pet. 1:2) in which the ultimate Shalom is to be found in experiencing peace and reconciliation with God (Luke 2:14, Rom. 5:1).

 

v. 2a: "It has seemed good to me…”

o   It was deemed seemly, highly becoming, morally decent, and a matter of ethical responsibility, to publicly relate all of God’s acts of graciousness and benevolence unto him.

 

o   Question: Do WE, as Christians, feel the same evangelistic burden?

 

Matt. 5:14-16:  “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden. Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.

 

Monday, December 6, 2021

Bulletin Insert (12/06/21): The Relevance & Importance of the Virgin Birth

 

The Virgin Birth of Christ:

A Central Doctrine to be affirmed by all Christians!

By Pastor Terry L. Reese, Valley GBC of Armagh of PA; Dec. 5, AD 2021

 

Intro: A Doctrine under assault. Over the years—particularly in Modern Times, the Virgin Conception of our Lord has come under siege from a variety of sources. These include materialist/rationalist philosophy, eastern-style mysticism, and the numerous schools of Liberal Theology—not to mention modern pragmatism & theological indifference to doctrinal matters. But God’s people cannot remain aloof to such challenges; there are few matters of greater practical relevance to the believer than the matter of the Virgin Birth!

 

I. Key issue #1: What manner of GOD do you believe in?

The Virgin Birth was the epicenter of a watershed debate in the late 19th & early 20th centuries between Bible-believing conservatives and liberal Modernists. Modernists promoted an imminent view of Deity (i.e., God is everywhere-in-everything) which, in its extreme form, tended towards pantheism (i.e., the idea that “god” is an impersonal force). Thus, they were pre-disposed to reject the concept of miracles, which requires a conscious and intelligent Personality to suspend or override the Laws of Nature. However, if one affirms the Biblical perspective that God is an omnipotent Personnot an “itwho supernaturally created Heaven & Earth ex nihlo (i.e., out of nothing), then the comparably small matter of a Virgin Birth presents no grave difficulty! Is the arm of the Lord to short to do such things?

 

Luke 1:37: "For nothing will be impossible with God."

 

II. Key issue #2: What manner of BIBLE do you believe in?

The Virgin Conception of Christ is clearly and explicitly taught by a variety of writers in both Testaments (Luke 1:34-35, Matt. 1:18-25; also cf. Gen. 3:15 & Isa. 7:14). Plainly, if Jesus Christ was not Virgin-Born, then the Bible’s claim to inerrancy is false!

 

III. Key issue #3: What better EXPLANATION do we have than the Virgin Birth for various enigmas posed by the Word of God?

Through the device of the Virgin Birth, we see a variety of biblical challenges & imperatives satisfactorily resolved, including the following concerns…

 

A. The promised Messiah must be the legal heir and biological Son of David (Acts 13:23)—and yet, He cannot be a blood descendent of the accursed King Coniah (Jer. 22:30). Through the Virgin Birth, the issue is resolved: Jesus is David’s legal heir through the kingly-line traced to Joseph (Matt. 1:1-17), who was Christ’s legal—but not biological—father. Jesus is, however, a blood descendent of David through an alternate Davidic line traced through Mary (Luke 3:23-38)thus bypassing the curse placed upon Coniah and his descendants!

 

B. Through the Virgin Birth, Messiah was able to be both David’s Son, as well as his Lord (Ps. 110:1a)—thus solving a great mystery that the Pharisees were unable to resolve (Matt. 22:41-46)!

 

C. What better explanation do we have than the Virgin Birth for the singular phenomenon of a unique, sinless mannot conceived, like the rest of us, in sin (Ps. 51:5)? (2 Cor. 5:21, Heb 4:15, 1 Pet. 2:22, 1 John 3:5). Note the inference of Luke 1:35:

 

Luke 1:35: "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God.”

 

D. How else does one explain the entrance into this world of a single Person who is both pre-existent Deity (John 1:1, Phil. 2:6, Col. 2:9) and genuine Humanity (John 1:14, Phil. 2:7-8)? Through what other mechanism than the supernaturally-directed Virgin Birth can we explain the mystery of the Incarnation?

 

The Doctrine’s Supreme Importance: Outside of the Virgin Birth, it is most difficult to conceive of the reality of the Incarnation. If Christ is not true God and true Man, than He is not qualified to be our Savior!

 

Q: Can a man be saved and deny the Virgin Birth? Answer: NO!

Failure to unwaveringly affirm the Biblically-revealed central dogma of the Virgin Birth flatly places a man outside of the pale of any form of legitimate or recognizable Christianity, and constitutes clear evidence of the individual’s unregenerate nature (Matt. 7:15-20).

 

In the end, those who would deny the Virgin Birth today are much like His Jewish critics back in the Days of His humility, dishonoring the Person of our Lord—as well as His mother (cf. John 8:41; John 8:48-49). Ultimately, such an attack is rooted in disdain for His Deity.

 

John 8:24: “…for unless you believe that I AM, you will die in your sins."